It seems like a step in the right direction to combat scalpers.I&#x27;ve wondered though... Why not have a non-transferrable ticket system? If you can&#x27;t go then you return your tickets to the pool and if they sell you get your money back.

Actually the artists set aside tickets specifically for resale. At a company i worked at we did this on behalf of the artists and content-rightsholders directly to maximize their profit. Your favorite artist loves money and resale more than affordability

&quot;Stream fraud&quot; is already a thing, so if anything this would make botting more profitable. Great synergy to be had here by fraudsters

Sounds like a good way to pump the numbers

Surely this will get arbitraged like anything else, where fans who get picks will onsell tickets

there&#x27;s always a criticism, something has to give.lest you desire verifiable gov based ID tracking?

seems like it would just get botted like anything else and also make it harder for fans of an artist who don&#x27;t use spotify to get tickets

Honestly, this could turn out to be a really great thing.When artists become popular, they often complain that the people they are making their music for, their biggest fans, tend to be the people least able to afford the concert tickets.The artists are often totally willing to set aside a chunk of tickets at a much cheaper price, but they need to be able to guarantee that these tickets aren&#x27;t just purchased by scalpers and resold at the market price.So if you can actually tie ticket availability to genuine listening patterns of this artist over time, in a way that is very difficult to game, then this could be huge.Obviously you can worry about scalpers that will now try to open 1000 different Spotify accounts so that they can buy up 1000 tickets. But it should be pretty easy for Spotify to look for signals that indicate real human listeners, I would think.

What about both? Artists want money, fans want entry, reserve a portion for hardcore fans and the remainder by auction. Artists get to sell their $10k seats to the rich while looking like they’re giving an amazing discount to their fans.

If you&#x27;re selling out venues at 5x a normal ticket price you will quickly be playing in much larger venues until you can&#x27;t sell them out except at face value

You are overlooking the secondary effect — what happens if you, a musician, a person who lives off having a positive public image, becomes known as the kind of musician who uses free market forces to effectively price fans out? Fans will not like it. It is not rational but nothing in music is. You win the pricing battle but lose the PR war. It&#x27;s bad for your business and the entire business of concerts in the long run.And with your particular pricing scheme, there is arguably still nothing stopping scalpers from scooping up the tickets after the price drops to a level likely to be profitable for them but before fans had the time to react. In fact it would probably benefit the scalpers even more because they will have more time to track price drops than your average fan!

This is basically what is already happening with dynamic pricing. Tickets are now most expensive at the original sale and get cheaper over time until sold

Not good for fans. And happy fans are good for artist. So not good for artist.

Good for artist, bad for those fans who have shallow pocket.

Terrible idea. The venues would taking on all the risk and could even cancel a show if there are not enough ticket purchases because its steepest discount is only the day before the show.A person purchasing a ticket a month or two in advance prior to the show off loads the risk from the venue. They purchase the ticket thinking they can make the show in two months because the event is a long ways away. People know what they are going to do a week advanced most of the time and therefore might just forego purchasing the ticket a that point in time, because there it has instant depreciating value at the point of sale.

The live music experience would be terrible if only the richest fans can get in. Every crowd would be old and square.

The fact there are more people want X than the total number of X.

Auction. Auction is the answer.Or, when a tour is announced, start tickets at 10X the regular price and have it drop down to the regular price over the course of a couple of weeks in a simple time based mechanism. After that, if tickets are not sold out it continues to drop until sold or it hits a reserve price for Door tickets.Good for artists, fair from a market perspective and gets rid of scalpers

Apple needs to get into this space QUICK. They just added concert dates in Apple Music. Let me buy tickets with Apple Pay from the app and it&#x27;s over.

Livestream more things and sell digital tickets. Doesn’t do anything directly, but acts as a substitute to shift demand away. Not much point in scalping tickets to a livestream unless the supply is limited, either by an artificial cap or technical constraints.

I have some tickets to big gigs coming up and they cannot be resold. On Ticketmaster.

There are many solutions.For example - allow ticket resale only through the official platform and cap it at the original sale price.Another approach - check IDs at the door and only let the original ticket purchaser through.The real problem is that scalping is insanely profitable for Ticketmaster &amp; co. They take a cut of the original sale and every subsequent transfer, most of them at highly inflated prices, from both buyer and seller. Why would they give that up?

FIFA’s solution seems reasonable. The tickets are auctioned. EDM festivals usually have an earlier round for people who attended previous iterations which is similar to this approach by Spotify.One way is to run an auction and provide every attendee on site with a credit code they can apply to next year’s auction. That way you tip the scales slightly towards previous attendees in a way a scalper can’t reliably access.Another way is to run separate auctions: one for previous attendees, one for fan club members, and one for GA.The aversion to auctions transforms everything into a lottery but I can see why they do it. The event operator takes all the heat and the artist keeps much of the benefit.

If it can still be resold online, it won’t mitigate scalping much for on-demand shows. You can see that on any scalping-heavy items that require a person to be there physically to purchase the item (cards, collectibles from restaurants, and etc.).Above-face-value ticket resale is illegal here and it helps a lot. But you need to make sure this gets prosecuted hard.

I like it. Your last bit is good marketing against those who think paying a linesitter &#x2F; spot holder is all upside.Also economics of paying linesitters make it relatively much less attractive than all-digital scalping. So I think you have a solid plan. Should greatly reduce scalping.Reminds me of technologically-inclined woman who pointed out the flawed thinking behind a grocery store handing out first-gen iPads to their shelf stockers. “I love my iPad at home but this will cost them so much time compared to pen and paper.” (Gotta go find out whatever happened to putting an RFID tag in every product, maybe they needed to hit 1&#x2F;10 of a cent instead of a penny or something)

That excludes all fans who don&#x27;t live in big cities. A lot of people travel just to go to shows.

Go back to the old way. Get in line physically and go get the tickets. This is one of those &quot;technology should help here but actually makes the problem worse in weird ways&quot; type of situations.Nine Inch Nails&#x2F;Trent Reznor did this in 2018 and it was infinitely better (I also met a lot of people just standing in line—we recognized each other at the show later and ended up throwing each other around in the mosh pit—a great time) [1].[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nin.com&#x2F;tickets2018&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nin.com&#x2F;tickets2018&#x2F;</a>

This is the answer, Ive seen it in practice. You just have to show id at the door when your ticket&#x2F;QR gets scanned as normal, and the names have to match. Obviously only works for over 18 events though, unless you purposely sell under and over 18 tickets seperately.

This is how all the big video game conventions do things to prevent it, it’s very effective.

Still have the issue of transferring tickets to friends or such if you can&#x27;t make it. Axios and some providers handle this.

On the other hand, airplane ticketing is also notorious for stuff like overbooking flights with the assumption people won&#x27;t show up and then in the rare circumstances where too many do show up, forcing people to give up their seats (in some cases even by force). I don&#x27;t disagree with your thinking, but I&#x27;m hesitant to consider &quot;what airplane tickets do&quot; a good model for just about anything.

Some festivals work just like that, you upload some ID when buying your ticket which they see when you enter the venue. Feels really nice and stress free.

Named tickets, like airplane seats?Sorry, I only thought about this for 5 seconds, but there are markets where scalping doesn&#x27;t cause issues. We could look at those.

The only real way is to pass a law against reselling tickets above face price, which is what many European countries have done

Have the tickets debut at a very high price and get cheaper towards event day. This encourages folks to wait and scalpers to lose money. Enables privacy, although other factors are working to eliminate it.

They would to multiple the prices multiple times to even discourage the middlemen, gentrifying at the same time the fan base, which is sad

The only real solutions to scalping are to impact supply&#x2F;demand by increasing supply (extra show in each city) or lower demand (raise prices). As a jazz fan I don’t know much about shows that sell out and attract scalpers, but I’m curious why the artists don’t double prices to cut out middlemen.

I know this doesn&#x27;t work for most subscribers to mass media culture, but I&#x27;m right there with you. Personally I kind of hate celebrity as a social phenomenon, and I love seeing an amazing talented set and then getting to talk with the musician afterward. I don&#x27;t give Live Nation my money.

Not a direct answer to your question but go to see local bands. The ticket prices are way better and so is the crowd and the show.

I assume the scalpers demand their additional payment first and upon receipt, name the buyer who can buy the ticket &quot;for face value&quot;.

It&#x27;s trivially easy for scalpers to game that system.

I recently bought tickets to a concert in France (I live in Germany) and ended up not being able to travel and had to resell my tickets. Apparently according to French law you are not allowed to resell a ticket above its face value and so I had to resell it through the same ticketing company I bought it. They allowed me to set a price with up to a maximum amount which was less than how much I bought it (by a Euro or two) to cover their fees. It was also possible to name a specific buyer who would then get be able to buy your ticket.Maybe there’s still another way for scalpels to game this system, I don’t know, but I’ve been to a few concerts in Paris and I’ve never seen scalpels hanging outside the venue selling tickets, which would be the norm in Germany, so maybe the system does work.

&gt;Why should anything be done?For the same reason anything is ever done about anything -- because it upsets a large enough portion of your community.

&gt; Why should anything be done?Because there is demand for it. A lot of people like going to live music and theatre events and scalpers make it more difficult and more expensive for them.Why shouldn&#x27;t anything be done? Because capitalism is God?

I never understood the issue with scalping and reselling tickets for a higher price. At all. And I&#x27;ve read a bunch of opinions here and on other forums and articles. None make any sense to me. It&#x27;s a good that&#x27;s being resold for profit. Not an essential one like rare medicine during a pandemic.I think some artists want to appeal to the poorer people so pricing their tickets higher or letting the free market work out the price would damage their reputation. So it doesn&#x27;t seem to be a real problem we need to solve. It&#x27;s a problem some artists feel they have. Let them figure it out.If I was an artist and I expected a full venue with tickets that cost 10, I&#x27;d start selling them at 1000, then at 500, 200, 100, 50, 20 and finally 10. If someone buys all of them at 1000 and only that person shows up - awesome! Maybe there will be less drug sales because 1 person bought all tickets but that 100x per ticket could be used to pay the vendors.

Why should anything be done? If people are willing to pay five times the face value for a ticket, then it signals that tickets are priced too low. Let the market price itself.Harry Styles is playing in my city, he&#x27;s apparently very popular, but there&#x27;s still plenty of tickets available for as low as 47€ for tomorrow.

New idea: You have to tie a valid credit card to a ticket in order to transfer it, if the card doesn&#x27;t authorize for $500 at the gate, admission is denied, and the ticket can be used to charge unlimited concessions and merch to the original buyer&#x27;s card. If a scalper sells a ticket to a stranger, the customer could bankrupt them at the show.

so they&#x27;re partnering with Live Nation, the same company that&#x27;s part of the vertically integrated monopoly on ticketing, venues, and resale. Nobody is buying these tickets for cash from a scalper outside of the venue. My 2-min tought: tie use of the ticket to the payment method or id of the purchaser; allow limited transfers. If LN&#x2F;TM actually cared they&#x27;d provide for risk-free transfer without charging ridiculous mark-up. Since they sell the orginial ticket 95% of the time they have almost complete control over the pricing and consumer&#x27;s id.

I&#x27;m a perfect world, artists would rent a facility and sell&#x2F;resell their own tickets (or partner with a ticket processor that offers price caps on resales) thereby controlling the issuance and resale of tickets. In reality, the facilities often have their own deals with people like ticketmaster and the artist has no control. It works out for the artist because they lock in the msrp of every ticket and don&#x27;t have to deal with demand. But it sucks for the fans. Capitalism.

I agree with supply and demand dictating the price on scarce items. I don’t agree with letting middlemen butt in and drive the price up by exacerbating the scarcity, and making a profit with no value add to the market.

I agree with the libertarians on this. Scalping isn&#x27;t an issue. People who are willing to pay more for tickets should get them. Concert tickets are not basic needs like housing or food.If there is room for arbitrage (which is what scalping really is) then the tickets are too cheap in the first place.

Spotify is another entity dipping into the limited pool of available tickets and further limiting supply. I don&#x27;t pay for&#x2F;use Spotify and don&#x27;t want to, so as far as I&#x27;m concerned this is only worsening the problem by further constraining the supply of tickets available to me.

Scalpers will just do two transactions, one high one for the privilege of being able to buy the ticket, and then the sale at the listed limit.No, the real solution is to make tickets strictly id-bound and non-transferable in any way.

In the UK they&#x27;re making it illegal to resell tickets for more than the original cost. That should deal with the majority of the problem.

It&#x27;s a bandaid and not a particularly good one. Spotify reserving a ticket allotment is really no different to American Express doing the exact same thing. Amex uses their allotment to attract premium members through concierge services. Spotify doesn&#x27;t quite have this same upsell potential (yet?) but they&#x27;re doing it to make money. We just don&#x27;t know how that&#x27;ll happen yet.Defeating bot buyers, scalpers and resellers would actually be a noble goal but its&#x27; really the tip of the iceberg. If anyone was actually interested in tackling this (hint: they aren&#x27;t) then you need to tackle a much bigger problem: the venue monopoly with Ticketmaster and Live Nation.Many venus, particularly larger venues, have exclusive contracts with Ticketmaster. Ticketmaster also has an official platform for reselling tickets, of which they get a cut. In a more equitable world, you would only be able to resell tickets for their face value. It&#x27;s alleged (and I believe this) that Ticketmaster only releases a tiny portion of tickets to the general public. The rest they have arrangements to sell through scalpers and resellers and their own platform because, hey, they make more profit that way.There was a time when businesses were a tool to generate income. Small businesses still work this way. But any sufficiently sized company now is just a tool to speculate on and make a capital gain on. Ticketmaster doesn&#x27;t need to grow into a trillion dollar company but they want to and, at a cewrtain point, the only way companies can continue to grow is by cutting costs and raising prices.Back in the nascent days of Internet music piracy it was pointed out that almost no bands make enough money from selling music to live on. It&#x27;s why the biggest anti-piracy advocates were huge bands like Metallica. Most bands make their living for performance fees ie playing concerts. And even then they might make barely enough to cover gas. What really gets them over the line is selling merch at the venues.I&#x27;d say that music would be in a better state if bands could see more of the value of their labor from playing concerts. But even concerts aren&#x27;t about bands or their fans anymore. They&#x27;re about upselling premium services to high-net-worth clients. You ever notice that at sports venue, for example, general seating always gets mysteriously ripped out and replaced by suites? Same principle: venues make more per square foot from a corporate suite than they do from sports fans. There was a time when ordinary people would be fans of their home teams and just go to every home game. That&#x27;s increasingly out of reach.In short, the entire system is broken. Spotify participating in it won&#x27;t change anything.

No, it‘s an audience&#x2F;artist experience problem. I worked for one of Australia&#x27;s biggest outdoor summer music festivals through the 2000s (I built a direct ticket selling platform for them). Their popularity grew each year, and, sure, they could have just raised their prices to try and match supply and demand. They 100% did not want to do that because they knew it would completely change the audience demographics and make a less fun event for everyone to attend and a less fun event for the artists to perform at, thus making it harder to attract audiences and artists in future years.They ended up being acquired by a company that was much more into charging top dollar to big-spenders. The company was ultimately acquired by Live Nation and the ticket
prices kept increasing until suddenly ticket sales stopped, and that whole category of festivals is now largely dead in Australia.

There is a physical limit to how many shows you can put on and the Economics 101 explanation of ticket pricing misses the part where the price of the ticket is a part of the whole image the musician is selling to the audiences.Taylor Swift can probably still sell out if she raises the price ten fold, but what kind message does this send to her average listeners? What does it mean if the most popular popular musician of our times prices the populace out? You can of course dismiss the likely negative responses as emotional and irrational, but that&#x27;s the whole deal with art and culture. You can&#x27;t build a fan base without catering to their emotions.And then on the other extreme of music you have people like Fugazi, whose low ticket pricing is very obviously a part of the band&#x27;s entire artistic and ideological project.If you want to see what happens when you apply supply and demand to ticket pricing, you can just look at your nearest big league sports team. The recent trend seems to be jacking up the prices as much as they can get away with and catering more and more to VIP guests who spend a fortune in one of those &quot;hospitality&quot; suites. Perhaps not a coincidence that less and less people, especially younger people, around me are casually into sports these days. They got told that they are not welcome in the corporate owned sports venue and they take their attention elsewhere, and all it&#x27;s left are a dwindling set of diehard fans and C-suite people who are there not for sports but for overpriced steak dinners and are too nicely dressed to cheer for their home team.

The last&#x2F;marginal ticket in the venue sells for 10x face value. The majority of tickets don’t sell for much more than face value.Taylor Swift can’t realistically play more shows than she did during the Eras Tour, and it’s unlikely that she’d have sold a million seats in London if she were charging much more than she did.

I think its more complicated than that. An artist is pretty constrained by how many shows they can play in a given area which makes the total market for any given show really small and trivially manipulated for profit.

This may come as a shock to capitalists, but some artists don&#x27;t want to charge their fans more. Fugazi famously capped their ticket prices at $5 because they wanted their shows to be affordable.

This is ultimately a supply and demand problem. If tickets sell out on the secondary market for 10 or 100x the face value, then that&#x27;s the fair market price. Either artists should charge more, or perform more shows.

I was a big fan of what the Cure did, they played our town and they did not allow any tickets to be resold for anything above what they originally went for.Non-transferable I think? But you could resell them via ticketmaster maybe for facevalue?It was amazing, we sat on the ticketmaster page, refreshed over the course of a day and we got 8th row for I believe $75 - it was an amazing concert, and being able to pay a reasonable price for tickets like that was amazing.

How does this not just bias who gets ticket to those with more time preference.

Make it illegal to sell tickets above face value.

Two options, both of which seem to work well in venues near me:1. When an event sells out you can join the &#x27;waitlist&#x27; and people can offer their tickets back to the ticket company who give the person at the top of the waitlist the opportunity to purchase. All at face value. Good for the artist too as there is less chance of empty seats when people can&#x27;t make it.2. QR code tickets that rotate meaning they can&#x27;t be screenshotted and sold.

You are just being punished for your poor judgement for not backing the winner. Not sure why you should be rewarded.It&#x27;s the same logic for de-googlers. You can&#x27;t De-Google yourself and then bitch about some Google products work better on Google products.If you are a proud edge-lord&#x2F;hipster with your obscure choices, you should also learn to deal with consequences.Scale brings advantages. You can&#x27;t have it both ways

I’m against it from these angles:1. I like live concerts but I don’t spend my days listening to a lot of music. I would be considered “not a fan” by these metrics.2 The monopolistic aspect. I subscribe to a much smaller Spotify competitor, now I’m at a disadvantage.3. I don’t consider scalping a problem. The market price is determined by demand. It’s also been a problem that has been solved by artist presales and fan club gates.I also think that as a recognized monopoly Ticketmaster should have more limitations on its business model. For example, their compassion on resale tickets should be limited. At present, they are encouraged to double dip on fees by finding ways to send more tickets to the secondary market.

For those against this: I&#x27;m curious to hear your take on how you&#x27;d stop&#x2F;mitigate scalping.

I gave up on Spotify after 3 months. I did not like how it just kept repeating the same songs. With a catalog as large as they supposedly have, it was not entertaining me hearing the same things so frequently.Way back when, I had a very impressive iTunes catalog of actual media files that I had locally. I spent hours curating my CD rips and even the recordings from vinyl. I added id3 tags and artwork. It was glorious and was larger than my 80GB iPod could handle, so my iPod had curation as well.Then iTunes went all streaming and wiped out my local library, not the media files, just the library. Gone. Poof. And just like that, I was done. I recently dug out the hdd with the media, and using iTunes now to find local stuff loaded onto my device is a constant fight with trying to avoid its clearly preferred Music+ nonsense.I&#x27;m close to getting back to looking for a better music app to source my large local library. Just haven&#x27;t quite gotten there yet.

I’ve never really had good luck with the artist radio, but I’ve found a lot of music I like by starting at a band I like and going through the Related Artists. It’s a little strange because I’m sure the artist radio includes a lot of songs from the Related Artists. It’s probably a psychological thing, wanting to feel like I’m in control instead of the app choosing for me.

Artist radios almost inevitably become a mix of songs I’ve listened to the most that have even the faintest crossover with the artist genre. It’s very, very frustrating and my biggest peeve about Spotify. I now ask an LLM for an artist radio playlist and copy it over to spotify, which is kind of a pain.

How would you like to manage those things? I listen to a lot of music and I&#x27;m pretty happy with Spotify. When I want to discover new music, I pick an artist I like and start the artist radio. I always get good new recommendations

Given that Plex just bumped their lifetime subscription price to $750, I can no longer recommend them. They are clearly more interested in becoming another streaming service, and are I think trying to push out their core users who probably make them very little money.

It&#x27;s good, but you still have to pay monthly for it. Feels like it kind of defeats the point of having a local collection.

OrJellyfin or Navidrome if you want to use free open source that does a decent enough job.

Hop on plex amp. Take control of your music.I realize that sounds like an Ad but I’ve been using it for a few months and I feel like I’ve rediscovered my joy for music again.

iTunes Match. It&#x27;s entirely your own stuff. You pay for it, or upload your own stuff you have from elsewhere. You own it. You stream it wherever.

I came back to Pandora recently and I think it has the best discovery out of any music platform. I don&#x27;t pay extra to play what I want, I curate radio stations and it&#x27;s been great. The only catch is you have to be diligent with your curation, because it starts to reach and while you may love song X from genre Y, the station is genre Z. If you&#x27;re not careful every station will become a mix of everything.

Pandora still exists and is quite good.

&gt; Examples: we still can’t manage playlists of albums, or down signal genres of music or even artists, or separate “calm” music for sleep from all the other generative playlist rankings they use.Youtube music thinks &quot;videogame music&quot; is a genre and lumps them all together, if you make the mistake of including even one song from a game OST any recommendations go out the window.For example, a &quot;chill&quot; mix with videogame music in it will happily start including Doom Eternal tracks because &quot;they&#x27;re the same thing, right?&quot;

YouTube music’s recommendations suck hard compared to Spotify and all the people I know who use it (a dozen) say the same thing. The only reason any of us use it seems to be because we only want to pay for one music service and we all use YouTube premium anyways. It’s amazing how big a hole that is in the service, that everyone I know agrees with the same thing.I gave up on recommendations and I just playlist my own music preferences over time. Like in the days of old.

Youtube Music is quite good for what you&#x27;re describing.

Same here, music is too important for me to give up this kind of control. I probably miss out on the discovery system of streaming services, but there are enough other sources (e.g. radio paradise).

I just never stopped downloading music. We have modern download stores selling CD-quality music completely DRM free. I like knowing that no matter what happens short of an actual apocalypse, I will never lose access to any of my music.I recently learned that two tracks on one of my favorite recent albums are straight up missing on streaming services. This only strengthened my resolve to stay the hell away from them.

I have a collection of flacs which contains the albums that matters deeply to me. I don’t mind not having access to unlimited music (I do have a spotify account but I rarely use it). I much prefer to do mindful listening, spending an hour or two, playing a full album at a time, or quickly composing a mood queue. I don’t even shuffle.

I’ve almost entirely given up on managing music. Just done with it.I listen to soma.fm and radioparadise.com .. I read one music magazine and listen to some of the music recommendations from there, but following any of it, over time, is a lost cause for me.I was just remarking to someone how music apps are the least interesting, personal, and innovative of all the things I live with.Examples: we still can’t manage playlists of albums, or down signal genres of music or even artists, or separate “calm” music for sleep from all the other generative playlist rankings they use.Apple Music is entirely useless to me since the only “for me” stuff they’ll generate is music for sleeping. As if I don’t do other things.

&gt; I also understand why they want to expandI&#x27;d have fewer complaints if I could hide the sections I&#x27;m not interested in (new releases, audiobooks, podcasts, concerts, etc...).

I have definitely become informed of concerts I’ve then gone to by way of Spotify. They know everyone I listen to and are well suited to advertise the artists I’d actually like to see to me.

Glad I made a true(r) random playlist before they shut their API, which I figure killed those toolsExpand to all Google Play Music features pls Spotify (play counts &amp; the impossible upload-your-own-music to Spotify’s cloud)

Unbelievable that spotify&#x27;s shuffle is still broken a decade later. No chance the people working there dont know about this as everyone with large playlists runs into it, but for whatever reason they refuse to fix it.

I disagree; Spotify is good at serving up sound, so it makes sense for them to also serve audiobooks and podcasts; just like it makes sense for video streaming services to have both movies and tv shows. Similarly for concerts; people who listen to a lot of music are probably interested in going to see their favorite band live.Mind you, I definitely have complaints about the app (like notifications interrupting music, their abysmal lock screen widget, and their &quot;randomization&quot; that always ends up playing the same few songs from a list of thousands); but I also understand why they want to expand.

&gt; Of course then you&#x27;ve gotta setup a whole stack to store it, make it available to your devices, etc etc.I have avoided building my own stack by uploading everything into Youtube Music (which used to be Google Music, which ... whatever.)It gets a little worse every day, and one day it&#x27;ll get bad enough where the pain of sysadmining something new will be preferable to them.

My impression from the selfhosted sub is that most people looking to replace spotify are not into albums, and want a lot of popular music not available on BC.

Cloud storage (I use Dropbox) and an app to sync it with my phone automatically. It doesn&#x27;t take a long time to set up.And if I want to listen to a random song I don&#x27;t have while I&#x27;m outside... I just don&#x27;t.

&gt;Of course then you&#x27;ve gotta setup a whole stack to store it, make it available to your devices, etc etc.Uhh, no you don&#x27;t? Nearly all of my Bandcamp purchases, except the literal one or two physical-only purchases that didn&#x27;t also come with a digital copy, are all available to stream to my heart&#x27;s content via the Bandcamp app and their website.I mean, I also download it all because I DJ, but yeah... having access to it whenever I want is entirely effortless and doesn&#x27;t require anything beyond Bandcamp itself.

&gt; Of course then you&#x27;ve gotta setup a whole stack to store itNo you do not. Just use an external drive and an MP3 player like some kind of caveman. There are plenty of high quality models out there. Additionally smart phones will let you store music on them to listen to using the player app of your choice (VLC or something).

If you&#x27;re on Apple devices it&#x27;s $25 a year for iTunes Match. You can throw all your Bandcamp purchases into the Music app and they&#x27;ll be available across your devices.

Another reason to use Bandcamp and just buy music. Of course then you&#x27;ve gotta setup a whole stack to store it, make it available to your devices, etc etc. I dunno, Spotify certainly isn&#x27;t going to get better at this point. Best we can hope is that they die and something better takes their place.

I understand not wanting them to expand into playlists and audiobooks.But concert tickets, notifications, etc., seems like a no-brainer. That is firmly within the category of music.

Less than 10 years ago I could stroll into a local record store in my city and buy paper tickets to concerts directly from them, zero markup, zero &quot;processing fees&quot;. And the ticket itself would be a souvenir because it often had a unique design or typeface. Now it&#x27;s just a hideous barcode.

It also likely makes it harder for people ho are not users of Spotify to get tickets - which is almost certainly the goal.

Apple’s prioritization of Apple Music on their HomePod turns me off it a bit. Could help guide users more to alternatives but would reduce services sales.Meh, I’m being kinda unfair b&#x2F;c the experience is gonna be better. Shame Spotify forces streaming from phone (YouTube Music can run on HomePod itself like Apple Music). YouTube Music via HomePod might play the audio from a music video instead of playing the real song, so does make sense to shuttle normies to the Apple service, but guess I don’t find the situation perfect.

You may need to move on to other services like Apple Music

At least concert tickets are somewhat aligned with listening to music, unlike autoplaying video podcasts on the homepage rather than showing my playlists.

So just use it for music. Who cares if the app bundle is bloated? If that&#x27;s really your main criteria, just use the web player

Touring costs a fortune for bands. They don&#x27;t even keep most of the money, the record label takes a big cut and there&#x27;s Ticketmaster after that, and now Spotify I guess. Selling paper-thin T-shirts, vinyl and lapel pins for absurd markups at the merch booth is how they make money.

I&#x27;m sorry what? Artists do not make money on streaming, they make it in touring. Spotify integrating concerts into the same product surface is the MOST logical thing they could do.

i get a lot of value from these other features (podcast, audiobook, concert suggestions) and would appreciate some livenation disruption

It&#x27;s the newest version of Zawinski&#x27;s Law of Software Envelopment:&gt; Every program attempts to expand until it can read mail. Those programs which cannot so expand are replaced by ones which can.

Spotify is welcome to go into all those other businesses, but why do they have to destroy their one valuable resource in an attempt to leverage it for all this other garbage? Doing one thing really good - so good that people will pay you for it - is not a &quot;purity principle&quot;. It used to be the fundamental reason for existence for many companies.

music listening has been falling for a while now. no company public or not will choose to commit suicide out of purity principle

Hmm, see I don’t agree. I use Spotify extensively for music, but also for podcasts and audiobooks. Great for a long car journey, or background listening whilst doing DIY.I have plenty of frustrations with the app, but not with the core offer as a delivery mechanism for various types of audio entertainment and information.

This is the problem with public listed companies that need to &quot;maximize shareholder values&quot; and look for infinite growth.I just want Spotify for music (playlist, recommendation, lossless audio). I don&#x27;t need their podcast, audiobook, ChatGPT, concert tickets etc. This just makes their app bloated for features I will never use.

The music industry got rid of all that years ago when the big labels swallowed the small indies and imposed their corporate culture everywhere. There are no A&amp;R men skulking through dive bars using drugs and girls to sign bands. The bands are now supposed to approach the labels with their Spotify listen counts and social media follower numbers ready.Rick Beato has a good video on why so many new generation superstars like Gracie Abrams are nepo babies who all the time and money in the world to chase music as a career.

The music industry works the way it does because a large amount of people involved are effectively working for free. Promoters, photographers, DJs, interns, writers, assistants, even some artists early on accept low or unpaid work because the industry offers networking, access, drugs, etc

They&#x27;ll trade off the inflated numbers for the royalties.

Spotify is actively incentivized to mitigate that, because they&#x27;re forced to pay royalties on every stream. This is, at least, a better situation than with Ticketmaster, who is actively incentivized to get scalpers as many tickets as they can.

They&#x27;d probably make this a feature for paying customers. I don&#x27;t think the economics of scalping this at scale would make sense you&#x27;re spending money for months and risk Spotify banning you if you get caught.

So scalpers will use bots to generate listens and shares, boosting listens for Spotify, in order to gain access to premium tickets. They are just adding a “barrier” that only inflates their listen counts while probably making it worse on actual valid ticket purchasers. 
I don’t see how this works out as planned

Competition in that space would be kinda good

the next ticketmaster... I really loathe what spotify has become

This is my shocked face when Ticketmaster aka LiveNation aka StubHub aka Spotify’s ticket reserve system is again a monopoly.._.

I was thinking the same thing. If there are very many seats available, it will probably be gamed by scalpers. If they are doing this, they should really do the math to try to make the expected ROI of an additional bot account doing 24&#x2F;7 streaming, slightly below the cheapest Spotify subscription price.

but of course! why wouldn&#x27;t you encourage bot accounts listening every kind of artist to scalp tickets?look at the monthly active users chart after this deal! promoted.

How is this not just a &quot;Spotify tax&quot; on tickets? I don&#x27;t use Spotify, and I don&#x27;t want to, because it&#x27;s obnoxious crippleware. Now Spotify will reserve tickets, forcing me to prove my loyalty to their platform for some reason, before attending a concert? This doesn&#x27;t make any sense. And if Live Nation cares about selling to authentic people, why do they not just take the proplem into their own hands and go after the scrapers?

Great, ticketmaster antitrust lawsuit round two.

This is a nice feature to have, it already tells you if an artist you like is coming to your city, and redirects to Ticketmaster for tickets, but it doesn&#x27;t have the data to know if you already bought a ticket, so it keeps pestering you. Also, some competition against Ticketmaster is welcomed.

I listen to all of my music via Navidrome. It sits in an S3 bucket that I rclone new albums to.For concerts, I built a PWA that pulls my Navidrome artists and queries the Ticketmaster API for shows that match within a 75 mile radius once a day. It displays them in a list with their name, the venue&#x2F;location and a link to buy tickets.

I have a shirt from nine inch nails offered too the top % of listeners with a bunch of streaming stats on the back so we&#x27;re almost there.

Soon, you will have to justify hours of Spotify usage to be allowed to buy tickets for shows.

So now we need to run farms of spotify accounts playing songs to get our concert tickets?

This is good to know. If they roll it out it like their other &quot;features&quot;, it&#x27;s going to reserve the tickets for you even if you don&#x27;t want them.Or they&#x27;re going to put it as a drop down from the &quot;Repeat&quot; button, or something stupid like that, to cause people to click it by accident.And when you disable it in the settings they&#x27;ll stop, but only for 6 months when they cram it down your throat again in a new place in the UI.I secretly wish Spotify would fire their entire product and dev teams, allow third party clients again, and just focus their energy on increasing their catalog and paying artists more.I don&#x27;t want to see lyrics, I don&#x27;t want AI shuffling, I don&#x27;t want videos, I don&#x27;t want concert tickets.

I only listen to Global Electronic Music. All underground stuff, so im safe from the capitalists.<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bassdrive.com&#x2F;pop-up&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bassdrive.com&#x2F;pop-up&#x2F;</a>

What a braindead move. If you see people post their &quot;wrapped&quot; you notice quite a lot of people basically streaming a single artist 24 hours a day. So now you&#x27;re encouraging people to become streaming bots. And you&#x27;re taking tickets from fans who don&#x27;t happen to use Spotify. Fuck Spotify.

&gt; Fewer people go to concertsScalpers don&#x27;t buy tickets and not sell them. The most scalped concerts are obviously the most attended&gt; fans can’t afford the ticketsSee above. I assume what you are upset about is that rich fans are the ones going.&gt; less connection with the artists, less interest in music overallI think you need to explain your logic here.

Fewer people go to concerts, fans can’t afford the tickets, less connection with the artists, less interest in music overall.Artists lose, even if they get paid and all the tickets technically are sold out. Fans lose. The only people who win are scalpers who just abuse the system.

Streams and share won&#x27;t be fair metric

Spotify will start reserving concert tickets for fans

Project Hail Mary – Stellar Navigation Chart

Blog ran on Ubuntu 16.04 for 10 years. I migrated it to FreeBSD

Using Kagi Search with Low Vision

Was my $48K GPU server worth it?

Uv is fantastic, but its package management UX is a mess

The Death of the Brick and Mortar Toy Store

For the past 5 years or so I&#x27;ve been working on a ground-up redesign of Freenet, my peer-to-peer project from the early 2000s (now renamed Hyphanet).The new Freenet has been up and running since December along with some early applications like River[1], our decentralized group chat and Delta - a decentralized CMS. Users have already started to build their own apps on Freenet including games, and we have some interesting apps in development like Atlas, a search&#x2F;recommendation engine.Architecturally, this new Freenet is a global, decentralized key-value store where keys are webassembly contracts which define what values (aka &quot;state&quot;) are valid for that key, how or when the values can be mutated, and how the state can be efficiently synchronized between peers.We&#x27;ve developed a unique (AFAIK) solution to the consistency problem, every contract must define a &quot;merge&quot; operation for the contract&#x27;s associated state. This operation must be commutative, meaning that you can merge multiple states in any order and you&#x27;ll get the same end result.This approach allows state updates to spread through the network like a virus[2], which typically achieves consistent global state in a few seconds or less.Like the world wide web, Freenet applications can be downloaded from the network itself and run in a web browser - similar to single-page apps on the normal web. However, rather than connecting back to an API running in a datacenter, the webapp connects locally to the Freenet peer and interacts with Freenet contracts and delegates over a local websocket connection.If you&#x27;d like to try Freenet we have convenient installers for the major desktop OSs but not yet mobile, and you can be chatting with other users on River within seconds[3]. Happy to answer any questions, you&#x27;re also welcome to read our FAQ[4], or watch a talk I gave back in March[5].[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;freenet&#x2F;river" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;freenet&#x2F;river</a>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;freenet.org&#x2F;about&#x2F;news&#x2F;summary-delta-sync&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;freenet.org&#x2F;about&#x2F;news&#x2F;summary-delta-sync&#x2F;</a>[3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;freenet.org&#x2F;quickstart&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;freenet.org&#x2F;quickstart&#x2F;</a>[4] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;freenet.org&#x2F;faq&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;freenet.org&#x2F;faq&#x2F;</a>[5] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;3SxNBz1VTE0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;3SxNBz1VTE0</a>

Show HN: Freenet, a peer-to-peer platform for decentralized apps

Indexing a year of video locally on a 2021 MacBook with Gemma4-31B (50GB swap)

Mycorrhizal Fungi, Nature's Key to Plant Survival and Success

The IBM-ification of Google?

Samsung chip workers will get an average $340k bonus as AI profits soar

Python 3.15: features that didn't make the headlines

Lost Images from the 1945 Trinity Nuclear Test Restored

Flipper One – we need your help

Hey HN, We&#x27;re Gus and Carlos from Runtime (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;runtm.com">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;runtm.com</a>). We&#x27;re building infra that lets your whole team (including non-engineers) ship with Claude Code, Codex, and other agents without engineering having to handhold every session.After Mentum (YC S21) was acquired, I personally shipped 4 full-stack products in 3 months using coding agents. When I tried to roll the same workflow out to the rest of the team, it fell apart: Most PRs were unmergeable slop - Every repo required an engineer doing one-off local setup. - Skills and context lived in one person&#x27;s head. - There was no safe way for a PM to touch a real codebase without risking a bad deploy or a secrets leak.Carlos comes from building agentic reconciliation systems at Modern Treasury and had a similar experience when letting his support team use devin.We ended up building internal background agent infra but it quickly became a nightmare to mantain and develop. We built Runtime so you don&#x27;t have to do this kind of thing.Runtime work like as follows. Engineering defines the context once: system instructions, skills, and scoped integrations installable via CLI, mise, npm, or any package manager. Then Runtime snapshots your full running environment including multi-service Docker Compose setups, Kafka, Redis, seeded DBs, so it comes up in milliseconds with every server already running.We orchestrate across sandbox providers like E2B, Daytona, EC2 or self-hosted K8s depending on your setup. Secrets are injected through our managed proxy so they never touch the agent directly, and guardrails run at the infrastructure level: command allow&#x2F;deny lists, network egress controls, and RBAC scoped per human and per agent. Every session also gets a shareable preview URL, so internal builds go from sandbox to the rest of the team without needing production access.Runtime works with whichever agent your team already uses: Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini, Devin. You can trigger sandboxes from our web app, CLI, Slack, Linear, GitHub, or API.One of our customers built an on-call inspector that wires PagerDuty, Sentry, and their repo so when an alert fires, the agent finds the cause and opens a PR with a unit test before anyone gets paged. Another runs a finance agent in a private Slack channel pulling from Stripe, NetSuite, and Snowflake to run reconciliations in minutes with source rows attached.A fintech unicorn and several YC scaleups are live on Runtime, including a few teams who had built similar infrastructure internally and handed it to us to take over.The core is open source at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;runtm-ai&#x2F;runtm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;runtm-ai&#x2F;runtm</a>. Hosted version is live at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;app.runtm.com">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;app.runtm.com</a>, free tier included. We&#x27;re charging a flat platform fee plus compute, no token markup.Check our demo: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=wLwj__aEEh4" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=wLwj__aEEh4</a>We&#x27;d love to hear how you&#x27;re thinking about the infra for letting more people across your org use coding agents without creating chaos!